|
|
Post by alb3rt on Sept 21, 2010 2:11:27 GMT
I have not played either game or any of the previous versions. I would just like for some one to tell me which one is best for me. I don't play online but me and my brothers have three controllers so I am wondering if i can play multiplayer and if so which one has the best offline multiplayer. Also in the story mode can me and my brothers play together. Thank you please answer my question please
|
|
|
|
Post by Nintendo Master on Sept 22, 2010 16:14:33 GMT
Hey alb3rt, welcome to the forums.
Well, I've always found COD to be the funnest FPS experience for me and my friends to enjoy, so I'd recommend that. I haven't played Halo Reach yet, but many of my friends think I'm a fool for not getting it on launch, so that must be pretty damn good too. Really, it depends what kind of game you want. If you want realism, get COD. If you like headshotting aliens, buy Halo. Whatever floats your boat.
|
|
|
|
Post by nolvorite on Sept 24, 2010 22:21:14 GMT
It seems like Black Ops is better. Although I also feel as if it's going to be similar to MW
|
|
|
|
Post by zawazuki on Jan 17, 2011 19:34:46 GMT
I'm going to say Black Ops is a lot better than Reach.
|
|
xypher
Newbie Member
Posts: 10
|
Post by xypher on Jan 27, 2011 23:31:45 GMT
I say Halo: Reach because it is a game that I actually some what enjoyed the campaign, where as with Black Ops, I can't play the campaign, it bores me.
|
|
|
|
Post by logan18 on Feb 13, 2011 4:46:47 GMT
Too different to compare.
Pros of Reach:
Excellent Campaign
Forge
Pros of Black Ops:
Decent Campaign
Multiplayer
Zombies
|
|
|
|
Post by ford1001 on Aug 13, 2011 3:16:09 GMT
I would have to say Black Ops,
|
|
